Sexual Harassment

POLICY

I. PREAMBLE

II. APPLICABILITY

III. DEFINITION OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT

IV. CREATION OF UNIVERSITY COUNCIL AGAINST SEXUAL HARASSMENT

In furtherance of its goal to eliminate sexual harassment, Seton Hall has created a University Council Against Sexual Harassment. The purpose of the University Council Against Sexual Harassment are:

  1. To monitor the implementation of the University's Policy Against Sexual Harassment;
  2. To propose amendments to the Policy as the need arises;
  3. To investigate and, if possible, resolve claims of alleged sexual harassment; and
  4. To make recommended findings of fact and propose sanctions;
  5. To conduct education and training programs throughout the Seton Hall Community.

The Council may, in writing, make recommended findings of fact and propose sanctions. Confidentiality to all parties will be provided to the extent possible and in accordance with the law. The Council shall make and maintain appropriate records. The University Council Against Sexual Harassment is not empowered to make binding determinations of facts and impose sanctions. The authority to make binding determinations of facts and impose sanctions is vested in the appropriate University authorities, for example, Dean of Students in the case of students, Deans, or Division Heads in the case of faculty members or employees.

A list of Council members shall be published regularly. Written guidelines regarding the handling if complaints are available through the Council.

V. PROCESS FOR RESOLVING AN INCIDENT OF ALLEGED SEXUAL HARASSMENT

Any individual who becomes aware of an incident of sexual harassment has a duty to report it to the Council as soon as possible. Members of the University community may assert a claim of alleged sexual harassment either informally or formally.

  1. The Informal Process: This process is designed to achieve resolution of the alleged incident informally. The informal process has no set structure or protocol, and is intended to be flexible in order to reach an acceptable solution. While a written statement from the complainant is helpful, it is not required to initiate or pursue the informal process.
  2. The Formal Process: In the formal process, a written complaint is required. The formal process requires that the hearing be tape recorded, that testimony be given under oath, and that the hearing be closed to the public. If any of these conditions is not met, the hearing is not formal. The complete process for the formal hearing is set forth in the written guidelines issued by the Council and available through the Council.

In both the informal and formal processes either party may be accompanied by another individual from the University for support purposes. This person is not permitted to participate in either process. Attorneys are not permitted to participate in either process.

VI. SANCTIONS

Misconduct constituting sexual harassment will be dealt with appropriately. Responsive act ion may include, for example, training, referral to counseling, and disciplinary actions such as warnings, reprimands, withholding of a promotion, reassignment, temporary suspension without pay, compensation adjustment or termination. False charges may result on no actions being taken, corrective action being taken against the accuser, sanctions against the accuser, or countercharges. Guidance regarding the recommended sanctions may be found in the written guidelines.

VII. STATEMENT ON CONSENSUAL RELATIONSHIPS

The University considers is inappropriate for any member of the University community to establish an intimate relationship with a student, subordinate o r colleague upon whose academic or work performance he or she will be required to make professional judgments. The University requires that the faculty member, administrator, graduate assistant, staff member or employee cease such conduct and/or divest himself or herself of the professional responsibility for supervision or oversight, should an intimate relationship develop.

Revised and Adopted June 1993
Effective Academic Year 1993

Policy No.    Revision No. 1    Eff. Date: June 1993    [mds-10/96]